Founding Member & Managing Partner at Gina Corena & Associates
Practice Areas: Personal Injury
Intersections in Las Vegas are among the busiest and most dangerous in Nevada. A large percentage of serious crashes happen when drivers attempt left turns. These accidents often result in side-impact collisions that leave little protection for occupants.
Left-turn crashes are rarely simple. Understanding how Nevada law assigns fault, what evidence matters most, and what rights victims have is essential. This guide explains what state statutes say about left-turn accidents, how fault is determined, and the practical steps accident victims should take.
According to the Federal Highway Administration, nearly half of all crashes in the U.S. occur at intersections, with left turns posing higher risks than right turns. In Las Vegas, drivers frequently encounter protected left-turn signals (green arrows) and permissive left turns (green or flashing yellow lights).
Misreading a permissive signal or misjudging oncoming traffic speed can quickly lead to a serious crash.
Contributing factors in Las Vegas include:
Nevada statutes provide a clear framework for determining responsibility in left-turn crashes.
“The driver of a vehicle intending to turn to the left shall yield the right-of-way to any vehicle approaching from the opposite direction which is so close as to constitute an immediate hazard.” – NRS 484B.253
Key laws include:
“In any action to recover damages for death or injury, the comparative negligence of the plaintiff shall not bar recovery if it was not greater than the negligence of the defendant.” – NRS 41.141
While left-turning drivers are usually presumed at fault, liability isn’t automatic. Each case depends on the circumstances.
Left-turning drivers generally carry the duty to yield. This means if a collision occurs, they are usually presumed at fault. But certain exceptions can shift or split liability. If the oncoming driver was speeding excessively, they may be found partially liable for the crash.
When an oncoming driver runs a red light, they may hold the majority of the fault since their violation created the hazard. Fault can also fall on a driver in a double-left turn if they fail to enter the correct lane. Cutting across lanes violates Nevada’s turning rules.
Nevada follows comparative negligence, which allows fault to be shared. A driver who failed to yield can still recover damages if the other driver contributed to the accident. Since damages are reduced by fault percentage, strong evidence is key to deciding who pays—and how much.
Testimony alone rarely proves fault. Solid evidence is essential. Police reports, witness statements, dashcam footage, and vehicle black-box data can all play a role. But many people mistakenly believe Nevada’s highway traffic cameras record crashes. In reality:
According to the Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT), traffic cameras in Las Vegas are for real-time monitoring only and do not record footage.
Instead, valuable evidence often comes from casino or retail security cameras, nearby homes, or dashcams. Attorneys may also pursue public records.
The Nevada Public Records Act (NRS 239.0107) requires a written response to records requests within five business days. – Nevada Legislature
Signal timing, skid marks, and lane-use compliance under NRS 484B.400 all matter. Together, they show whether a driver created an ‘immediate hazard/
Knowing the proper steps to take after a crash protects both safety and legal rights:
Delays in collecting this information can make proving fault more difficult later.
In Nevada, accident victims generally have two years from the date of the crash to file a personal injury lawsuit. Insurance claims begin sooner, and many are disputed when fault is unclear.
Damages available in left-turn cases may include:
Insurance adjusters often argue that the left-turning driver is automatically at fault. Substantial evidence and legal support are usually necessary to challenge these assumptions and pursue fair compensation.
Scenario |
Likely Fault | Law |
Notes |
Left turn across oncoming car | Left-turn driver | NRS 484B.253 | Presumed at fault |
Oncoming driver speeding/red light | Oncoming driver | NRS 41.141 | Fault can be shared |
Double-left turn, wrong lane | Left-turn driver | NRS 484B.400 | Must use nearest lane |
Left turn on red (one-way to one-way) | Legal if safe | NRS 484B.307 | Yield required |
Left turn vs motorcycle | Left-turn driver | NRS 484B.253 | Extra caution duty |
Usually, the left-turning driver is at fault unless the oncoming driver is speeding, distracted, or running a red light.
Yes. Nevada’s comparative negligence law allows both drivers to share responsibility, reducing compensation by their percentage of fault.
Yes. From one one-way to another one-way after a complete stop, unless prohibited by posted signs.
Usually, the driver who failed to enter the nearest lane is at fault under Nevada’s turning lane statute.
No. NDOT cameras provide live feeds only and do not record or archive footage for later use in accident claims.
Left-turn accidents are among the most dangerous causes of crashes in Las Vegas, often leaving victims with serious injuries and complex insurance disputes. Nevada law requires turning drivers to yield, but fault depends on specific facts, evidence, and comparative negligence.
If you’ve been hurt in a left-turn accident, acting quickly to gather evidence and understand your rights is critical. The attorneys at Gina Corena & Associates have extensive experience handling complex car accident claims in Nevada. Contact Gina Corena & Associates today for a free consultation and learn how we can help you pursue fair compensation.
As founder of Gina Corena & Associates, she is dedicated to fighting for the rights of the people who suffer life-changing personal injuries in car, truck and motorcycle accidents as well as other types of personal injury. Gina feels fortunate to serve the Nevada community and hold wrongdoers accountable for their harm to her clients.