GET A FREE CONSULTATION
(702) 680-1111
Founding Member & Managing Partner at Gina Corena & Associates
Practice Areas: Personal Injury
The Nevada Department of Public Safety reports hundreds of serious injury crashes in Clark County each year. In many of these cases, fault is shared between more than one driver.
If you were injured in a Las Vegas accident and may have been partly responsible, you can still bring a claim. Nevada law allows recovery even when fault is shared, as long as your share does not exceed a legal limit.
Nevada’s comparative negligence rule under NRS 41.141 determines how compensation is reduced when multiple parties are at fault. This guide explains how shared fault is calculated and how it affects the amount you may recover.
Comparative negligence is the legal rule that allows fault to be shared between multiple parties in an accident. For example, if you were speeding slightly when another driver ran a red light and hit you, both actions may have contributed to the crash. Nevada assigns each party a percentage of fault based on their role in causing the accident.
Nevada uses a “modified” version of this rule:
The rule lives in NRS 41.141, which says your own negligence does not bar recovery as long as it “was not greater than” the negligence of the people you’re suing. In plainer terms: you can be up to half responsible and still collect.
Nevada did not always follow this approach. Before 1973, the state used a contributory negligence rule, which barred recovery if a person was even slightly at fault. That system was later replaced with the current modified comparative negligence rule.
Not every state handles shared fault the same way, and the system a state uses determines whether a partly at-fault victim walks away with money or nothing.
| Modified comparative (51% bar) | Recover if you’re 50% or less at fault; barred at 51% | Nevada and most states |
| Pure comparative | Recover even if you’re 99% at fault (reduced by your share) | California, Florida |
| Contributory | Barred from recovery if you’re even 1% at fault | A small number of states |
Nevada sits in the middle as a modified comparative state. That’s good news if you’re partly to blame: unlike the harsh contributory rule, a mistake on your part doesn’t automatically end your claim. It just reduces it.
In Nevada, you can recover damages as long as you are not more than 50% at fault.
For example, if your total damages are $100,000 and you are found 30% at fault, your recovery is reduced by that percentage, leaving you with $70,000.
If you are found 51% at fault, you recover nothing, even if your injuries are severe.
At exactly 50% fault, you can still recover half of your damages. Once fault shifts to 51%, recovery is barred entirely. Because of this cutoff, fault allocation often becomes a key point of dispute in injury cases.
| Key point: Even if you’re partially responsible, you can still recover damages — they’re just reduced in proportion to your share of the fault. |
When you’re assigned part of the blame, the reduction applies across the board, including:
Here’s a simple example. If your total damages are $80,000 and you are found 20% at fault, your recovery is reduced to $64,000. The portion assigned to your share of fault is not recoverable.
The same math becomes more significant in higher-value cases. For example, in a $200,000 claim, a change in fault from 10% to 30% would reduce recovery from $180,000 to $140,000.
Because of this, fault percentage often becomes one of the most contested issues in an injury claim. The evidence used to support or challenge that percentage can directly impact the final recovery.
| 0% | Yes | Full compensation |
| 10% | Yes | 90% of damages |
| 30% | Yes | 70% of damages |
| 49% | Yes | 51% of damages |
| 50% | Yes | 50% of damages |
| 51% or more | No | Nothing |
The shared-fault math doesn’t touch every case. In some situations your own percentage of fault won’t reduce what you recover at all:
Children are treated differently too. Nevada generally considers a child under seven incapable of negligence, so a young child usually can’t be assigned fault for their own injuries.
One more point almost no one explains: the seatbelt question. Under NRS 484D.495, the fact that you weren’t wearing a seatbelt generally can’t be used as evidence of negligence or to reduce your damages. An insurer may still raise it, but Nevada law limits how far that argument can go.
Fault percentages don’t come from thin air, and they’re not set by you or the other driver. Two things happen.
First, the insurance adjusters investigate and assign fault. Most claims are resolved at this stage, which is exactly why the adjuster’s early view of fault matters so much. Second, if a case can’t settle and goes to trial, a Nevada jury decides. The jury returns a special verdict that assigns a specific fault percentage to each party, and the judge applies the 50% rule to that finding.
The percentage is based on evidence: the police report, witness statements, photos of the vehicles and the scene, dashcam footage, and, in serious cases, an accident reconstruction expert. The stronger your evidence, the harder it is for anyone to inflate your share. For the basics of starting a claim, see our guide on how to file a car accident claim.
Insurance companies investigate every crash to assign fault and decide how much each party should pay. Fault is a major factor in how a claim is valued, and even small percentage shifts can affect the outcome.
Because of this, statements made to an adjuster early on can later be used when fault is being evaluated.
A short cheat sheet for dealing with an adjuster:
| Stick to the facts and let the evidence speak | Apologize or say things like “I didn’t see you” — they read as admissions |
| Get the police report; save photos, witness contacts, and dashcam footage | Guess at speeds, distances, or who was at fault |
| Talk to a lawyer before giving any recorded statement | Accept the insurer’s first fault finding as final |
| Report the crash promptly to your own insurer | Give a recorded statement while unrepresented |
For the basics on Nevada coverage requirements, the Nevada DMV insurance guide is a useful starting point.
Shared fault appears differently depending on where and how a crash occurs. A few Las Vegas examples:
In each of these, the fault percentage is negotiable, and that’s where having someone in your corner changes the outcome.
Even if you were partly responsible, Nevada law may still allow recovery as long as your share of fault is 50% or less. What you do immediately after the crash can affect how fault is later assigned.
In shared-fault cases, early decisions and documentation often matter more than people realize.
A good personal injury lawyer can shift the outcome of a shared-fault case. Even when you think part of the crash was your fault, an attorney can build your case, challenge an unfair fault percentage, handle the adjusters, and push for the full compensation you’re owed.
In these claims, a small change in your fault share can mean thousands of dollars, so it pays to have someone protecting that number.
At Gina Corena & Associates, we know how Nevada’s comparative negligence rules work and how to keep them applied fairly.
Yes. As long as you were 50% or less at fault, you can still recover compensation. Your payout is reduced by your percentage of fault under Nevada’s NRS 41.141.
Insurance adjusters assign fault first, based on the police report, evidence, and witness statements. If a case goes to trial, a jury sets each party’s fault percentage.
Often, yes. Insurers regularly assign blame that the evidence doesn’t support. A strong police report, photos, and witnesses can shift the fault percentage back where it belongs.
Under contributory negligence, being even 1% at fault bars recovery. Nevada uses modified comparative negligence, so you can recover as long as you’re 50% or less at fault.
Generally no. Under NRS 484D.495, not wearing a seatbelt usually can’t be used to reduce your damages, though an insurer may still try to raise it.
Being partly at fault doesn’t mean you’re out of options. Nevada’s comparative negligence system is designed to fairly share responsibility while still allowing injured people to recover. These cases get complicated, though, and insurers will try to shift more blame onto you, so the sooner you act, gather evidence, and talk to a lawyer, the better.
If you or a loved one was hurt in a car accident in Las Vegas and you think you might share some of the blame, don’t wait.Contact Gina Corena & Associates today for a free consultation to discuss your options and protect your rights.
As founder of Gina Corena & Associates, she is dedicated to fighting for the rights of the people who suffer life-changing personal injuries in car, truck and motorcycle accidents as well as other types of personal injury. Gina feels fortunate to serve the Nevada community and hold wrongdoers accountable for their harm to her clients.
